Login for HCCREMS partners
DETAILED RESOURCE DESCRIPTION

A Wetland Prioritisation Technique for the SMCMA Area

Publisher: Sydney Metro CMA
Others Involved: Wetland Care Australia
Date: 2009
Type: Publication

Summary

A desktop assessment method was developed for wetlands in the SMCMA area, to assess  wetland condition and better understand wetland rehabilitation priorities. This report reviews eight existing condition assessment and prioritisation methods.
Please scroll down for a detailed description
Availability:

Access this Resource

This report is freely available as a downloadable PDF from the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority website.

The report's APPENDICES are important, and provide a tabular summary of threats, values and the scoring templates used to undertake the prioritisation.
Other access information:

Detailed Description

Six well-regarded wetland assessment methodologies and two natural area assessment methodologies were reviewed - see list below. Three provided examples of techniques for prioritising wetlands for rehabilitation. Two techniques, Blanche (2003) and Butcher et al (2007) were most similar to what was needed and were used as a basis to develop an assessment and prioritisation method for the SMCMA.

The technique developed for prioritising SMCMA’s wetlands for rehabilitation considers:
1. Wetland values and threats,
2. The representation of the range of wetland types in Sydney,
3. Rehabilitation project development matters, and,
4. Consideration of the feasibility of proposed projects.

The method was piloted on the eight Directory of Important Wetlands of Australia (DIWA) listed wetlands in the SMCMA area.

The study provides information on current rehabilitation considerations as well as a snapshot of wetland condition at the time of the assessment. The complexity of wetland ownership, landowner intentions and consideration of the range of wetland types required an additional process to support the prioritisation of wetlands for rehabilitation projects.

Wetland assessment methods described and reviewed in the final report include:
1. Sainty, GR and Jacobs, SWL (1997)a Hawkesbury Nepean Saltmarsh Assessment. Hawkesbury Nepean Catchment Management Trust
2. Sainty, GR and Jacobs, SWL (1997)b Hawkesbury Nepean Wetland Assessment. Hawkesbury Nepean Catchment Management Trust
3. Blanch, S (2003) Towards a Conservation Assessment Methodology for Wetlands on the NSW North Coast. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation
4. Waterwatch Australia (2005) Waterways Health Check.
5. Kessler, M (2006) Development of a Non-Destructive Rapid Assessment Methodology for Saltmarsh in Urban Areas, As Tested in Sydney Harbour, NSW, Australia. Wetlands (Australia)
6. Butcher, R, Hale, J, and Cottingham, P (2007) South Australian River Murray Wetland Prioritisation. Report prepared for SA MDB NRM Board.
7. WetlandCare Australia (2007)a Biometric: Maintaining Australia’s Biodiversity Hotspots Program. WetlandCare Australia, Ballina NSW
8. WetlandCare Australia (2007)b Wetland Assessment Technique (Version 3.4). WetlandCare Australia, Ballina, NSW

Back to top

Related to this Resource

No related resources.